Tuesday, December 8, 2009

More Than Reproduction


More than Reproduction
There are many aspects that make a relationship successful, whether it is from a romantic point of view or even a friendship. While some believe that interaction and the idea of bonds between people are nothing more than chemical reactions or the mere fact that as humans we are supposed to find “the one” and reproduce, others know there are many more factors that make a relationship successful. Even though some professionals will continue to compare human unions to those of animals and scientific theories, others are convinced that it takes much more than science in order to create a lasting bond. No matter what statistics or professionals say in the end, each relationship is unique with its own ups and downs, as well as what really goes on behind the scenes in order to keep the love alive.





Not every aspect of life needs to be broken down into the overall goal of mankind: reproduction. In Helen Fisher’s After All, Maybe it’s…Biology she constantly makes connections between modern dating and previous civilization offerings in exchange for mating (Beedles and Petracca). While there is clearly evidence that behavior stays similar throughout history, not all actions and emotions can be broken down this way. This particular author also completely drags love at first sight through the mud by reducing a romantic act into nothing more than something squirrels do in order to procreate (Beedles and Petracca). For most people finding a lasting, loving relationship is much more important than simply having children, although it usually is a part of marriage. There are several complex aspects each person is looking for in a partner that go much farther beyond.


Attraction to prospective dyadic relationships: Effects of fate control, reflexive control, and partner's trustworthiness by Grzelak, Kuhlman, Yeagley, and Joireman discusses different aspects that make a relationship stronger such as: the overall trustworthiness of their partner, how one views the other in terms of social interaction, and attractiveness as well. Psychologists also note that interpersonal attraction includes experiences, liking, friendship, admiration, lust, and love (Weiten). What is known as the “Matching Hypothesis” also says that individuals will select a partner that is equal to their own physical appearance (Weiten). This type of connection typically produces a stronger bond and the pair is less likely to end their union (Weiten). A romantic union will rarely be successful and happy if those within the relationship are not attracted to one another. Professionals and typical people cannot deny the fact that sexual attraction to their partner is an important factor in committing to a long- term relationship, but it is not the only factor anymore. In today’s world finding a suitable mate over a short period of time and attempting to procreate is not on anybody’s list of goals to accomplish.




As mentioned previously, our relationships have become far more complex in modern society. Simply being handsome, strong, and capable of putting dinner on the table does not cut it anymore. Trust, items in common, communication, and the ability to grow as a couple are just a few of the traits most look for and strive to achieve in their relationships and marriages everyday. Couples who are committed or dating also typically have age, race, religion, social class, education, and values that are similar (Weiten). Love can be broken down into two categories: Passionate and Companionate. Ellen Berscheid and Elaine Hatfield have done extensive research on the topic of love and define Passionate love as intense emotion usually revolving around tender sexual feelings while companionate love is trusting, warm, with lots of affection as a couple’s lives become more and more combined (Weiten). Committed people find themselves in the deep end with companionate love which creates more satisfaction in a lasting relationship (Weiten). Commitment itself is the factor that makes a relationship more meaningful and stable.


Each connection is unique, using individual aspects of love, attraction, and communication in order to make it successful. Something as complex and intense as love and lasting relationships should never be reduced to simply chemistry or biology. Love is never easy or as simple as finding a mate who can reproduce the fastest; it is rather a great mystery that has captured the lives of millions across the globe for centuries. Love has given us great stories, lessons, and joy within our own hearts that can never be replaced. Even though the author believes scientifically love fades after only a few years, hopeless romantics will prevail and keep the multi-layered aspects of true love and relationships alive.







Works Cited:
Beedles, Bonnie, and Michael Petracca. Academic Communities/ Disciplinary Conventions. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2001. Print.


Fisher, Helen E. "After All, Maybe It's... Biology." 2001. Anatomy of Love: The Natural History of Monogamy, Adultery, and Divorce. W. W. Norton & Company Inc., 1992. 303-05. Print

Grzelak, Janusz L., Michael D. Kuhlman, Erin Yeagley, and Jeff A. Joireman. "Attraction to prospective dyadic relationships: Effects of fate control, reflexive control, and partner's trustworthiness." PsycINFO. Discovery Links. Web. 3 Dec. 2009.

Weiten, Wayne. Psychology: Themes & Variations. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning, 2008. Print.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Selecting the "Greatest Hits!"

Aubrie:
Another class together this semester =). I really enjoyed reading all of your work for this semester. Every time your writing was clear, concise, and kept me interested throughout each time I read one of your papers. It is very easy to follow your train of thought and keep up with the interesting topics you have chosen to write about which makes it so much easier for me not only to read your posts but to also grasp exactly what your point of view brings to a particular subject. The ability to make your work easy to read is a very valuable trait you have possessed throughout the course, and will make reports and other writing assignments for the future successful just like your work for this class. You have also been a great help to me as well when I was struggling with citations because yours are always correct, so for that I thank you immensely!

As far as “greatest hits” go I really enjoyed reading your post entitled, “The Regulator.” The facts you presented were well researched and relevant to the topic, but I especially enjoyed the section in which you gave your own opinion on the topic. These two sections were very eloquently written and really showed how greatly you feel for government restriction or lack there of. It is difficult for most Americans to decide on which political party to follow because it is like choosing the lesser of two evils, which is why millions of others cannot decide on which to join. I also really enjoyed your post, “That Golf Game is looking a Little Rusty.” The title was so perfect for the situation and it was really interesting to see your writing from a more playful side! I do not think it would be the best choice for our final project, but it was a really nice break from the serious side of your writing.

Another favorite of mine was “The Fracturing of the Family” post we did at the start of the semester. I really liked how you incorporated the fact that technology is always changing and how these seemingly amazing, tremendous advances for the electronic world have actually created suffering for the typical family setting. I think this particular post would be a great one to expand on. It seems like individuals who have lived in different decades have so many issues with our technological advances. Older people are always saying how teens are always on the phone or parents always complain that their children do not spend enough quality time with them. This might be a really great topic to expand on just because of the relevance it has on our current society. Overall, great work this semester! Even though I have not been reading your work all semester long, it was a great experience to go through all your writings at once because I feel like you have really evolved as a writer over the semester. Great work this semester and good luck in the future!

Krista:
I had so much fun reading all of your posts for the semester! I have not had the opportunity to read or work with you yet so I was really excited to get started! I first of all love the layout and title of your blog. At the start of this class I did not know how much our personalities would come out through our writings as well as the backgrounds we chose, but right away I was intrigued by your work! I feel like you and I are really similar in the way that our voices and opinions/ personalities come out through what we write. (“Some kind of Purple” was one of my favorites in terms of voice and using personal experiences! My momma says all kinds of catch phrases too.)

“Moving Forward” was another one of my favorites, and one I think you might want to expand on if you have not already. It was not what I was anticipating, but I believe that is the reason why I liked it so much. Your facts were presented really well and the overall stance you wanted to portray on the topic was very well executed and easy to follow. I am such a big advocate of being able to get your point across through your writings and doing such in a clear, concise way. “Working through it” was another one of my favorites to read. I feel like most people believe the idea of monogamy should be preserved, but then their actions do not follow their words. I felt like you chose to side with the idea of monogamy and really backed up what it means to our world and societal beliefs regardless of the trends in human sexual behavior. Definitely look over that post again in order decide whether or not to possible expand it, because it really has potential to be great!

Your final “greatest hit” in my opinion would have to be “Ideas and Thoughts.” Reading your blog was a blast from the past of earlier in the semester. I remember getting this assignment and thinking about how difficult it was going to be to actual discussing what an idea or thought was. I thought you had some really great things to say on the matter and did a nice job of getting your opinion across on the matter, especially with “not all thoughts are ideas.” This is a very interesting topic and with more research I think it could turn into something really great as well as unusual and interesting! I loved your work overall this semester and wish you the best of luck on our final project, as well as in the rest of your college career! Have a wonderful, restful break! (We all deserve one!)

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Week 12 Blog Reviews

Lauren: I really liked your first post “Two sides of the spectrum.” I thought you gave really great support for both sides of the issue and then stated how you felt about the topic. You also made great use of the text book and the particular people within it to make your piece stand out. I wish you would have left your personal thoughts out of the introduction though. If you restructure it so that it is all about the rules but not necessarily relating to your personal experiences I think it would make the start of the essay so much stronger and more professional. Other than that I saw only a few grammatical errors, but it was nothing a little more proofreading would not fix. Great job on this post, it has a great deal of potential to make an outstanding complete research essay! =)

Your second post was also very well written. I had a hard time really getting into that particular topic myself, but your essay really broke down the history of finance well. The facts and ideas used from the text only solidified your argument and overall it was nicely done. Great job this week!

Jess: I really liked the title from your first post, “Two Views, One Country.” This immediately sparked my interest and made me curios about the information you were about to present. You really did this post from your heart I believe. You included facts from other classes and discussed how maybe you cannot trust the government with everything. You really found the balance between having government and living without them although you seemed to tip more towards the less government, more privacy, less power for them side. I thought you did a really nice job!

Your second post was also very well done. I really liked how you eased the audience into the topic instead of jumping directly into the history and current information on finance. This essay grabbed my interest on the subject and then gradually led me to what your actual goal of the article review was. I really think that was a great way to go. It made a topic I struggled with seem more approachable and understandable. Great Job! =)

Deirdre: I thought your first post regarding governmental control was a good read. You were very concise in your writing and made direct arguments for both sides. I thought the piece was a little bit too short for me, just because it lacked a little bit more depth on each topic but you did make a strong case. I would also give more background on an opinion before placing it in your work (i.e. Sameer). Others might not know who this individual is or why his opinion matters.

Your second post was also very concise. You did a great job introducing and explaining the opinions and facts you used from the text this time around though. The history and explanation of finances development was also a really great addition to the piece. You did not really mention the current financial state or how the subject has progressed in the last century though which would have really made a positive impact on your overall essay. Great job this week! =)

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Money makes the World go round.

Money and the world of investing seems like a relatively new way of living and working with your hard earned pay check, in reality the world of finance has been around for much longer than we think. Even though it has only recently been created within an academic setting and discipline, it has been around for years. The hype nowadays is the amount of support the subject is getting from other realms of academia such as physics and economics. In Don Chance and Pamela Peterson’s article “The New Science of Finance” they discuss the changes and additions that have really taken the topic to the global obsession it has now become.

Finance used to be an art of formulas and other techniques only mathematical specialists or scientists could decipher. In the modern world, anyone could invest in the stock market or pick up a “How To” guide on finance. This type of accessibility has really made cracking the financial code so much easier for the typical person who is looking to make smarter moves with their money. None of this would have been possible without research and further exploration done into the subject by people like Merton or Scholes (Chance, Peterson 447). Their Nobel Prize winning research has really opened doors for finance in the modern world.

Due to the fact that our current economic situation is in turmoil, economists and other financial experts have really played a crucial role in the lives of consumers. Even though the world seems to be run by corporate greed and everyone’s desire to make as much money as possible, economic experts are so valuable to the economy by determining prices and value of items we buy everyday. Experts use the Gordon Model or other formulas in order to determine the price of items and their overall value to the consumer (Chance, Peterson 448). These formulas and models are another way technology and advancements within the topic have created an easier and more effective way to be successful in the world of finance. Other outlets like the stock market have become more popular and successful over time due to the social changes, such as wanting as much money as possible, our society has grown into. Without people constantly wanting to rise to the top, and without experts being on top of valuation the world of finance would cease to be as successful and powerful like it is today.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Week 11 Blog Reviews

Week 11 Blog Reviews:

Deirdre: I really liked your first blog. My parents often said similar things about toys, or constantly commented on how life is not measured by how many items of clothing I have or the character on my lunchbox. When I was a kid I frequently disagreed but now I see where they were going with the idea. I also really liked your section about Christmas. People do not care about family time or holiday dinners, but rather the best deal they can get on more things for the people around them. I really liked your blog overall!
Your second blog really hit home for me because I wrote about my Polish heritage and relatives. While I liked learning more about this particular ethnic group, I really wish it would have connected more to their lives in America, although you did mention contributions made during the war. Great writing this week! It is always fun to read!

Jess: I really like how you changed your background again! It is always a surprise to see what it will be next! I really liked the title of your first blog, it hit home for me because of my Catholic roots especially. I liked how you incorporated both sides of the issue and stated how you did not know exactly what side of the issue you were on. Overall I thought the support you used on how much Americans purchase as well as personal ideas on the subject made the post really interesting to read.
I also liked your second post about the Armenian race coming to America. I liked all the background you gave on the subject but wish you would have focused on the contributions to the economy more. Great job this week and I cannot wait for the next background!

Lauren: I really liked the title of your first blog. I thought the support you used on the topic was really well put together as well. Materialism in moderation can lead to happiness. It is really important to have a great deal of backup in order to support your points. In your second blog about the contributions the Korean race has given to the American economy was well written too. The statistics and amount of facts regarding their presence in America really supported your topic and overall points you were making. Great job this week! Keep up the great work.

Is Governmental Intervention the way to go?

The debate over government control has been a highly discussed topic for decades and even centuries. In some cases rising against the government and creating change for the betterment of you and loved ones around you can be revolutionary. After all, our great American country was founded and created by individuals who were upset with the state of their homeland’s government. They wanted a better life and did whatever they could to achieve it. On the other hand some believe the government is a greedy, corrupt system that really does not have the people in which they govern best interests at heart. Hopefully one day the world will be able to find the balance of the self-propelled dreams of the people while utilizing the assistance and presence of the government.

There are some individuals out there who will never believe government is the right choice for their particular goals or beliefs. In today’s society, especially in America, it is becoming more and more difficult for citizens to trust those in charge of the leadership in the country. Elections now are filed with petty games, cheap shots at the other nominees, and amazing promises the candidates make have no chance of ever being fulfilled. Americans feel like they have been cheated or lead on by these people who are supposed to be working for us and making our lives and American dreams more attainable. Another reason people are having a difficult time trusting their leaders are because of the conspiracies and events that are questionable throughout history. Events like 9/11 and the JFK assassination are constantly brought up as cover-ups and inside jobs. It is hard for working class citizens who love their country so much to believe their government is capable of such horrible things just for the sake of collecting money. This is the reason why individuals choose to ask questions, get petitions signed, and attempt to make our leaders accountable for their actions. People like Sameer Parekh in “Politics for the really cool” by Josh McHugh have taken matters into their own hands by creating a business that will work against traditional governmental agencies. These people are tired of listening to what the high and mighty officials have to say. They want the leaders to really hear their ideas and needs.

On this particular issue I stand in the middle. I do not like idea of always relying on the government to control my income, the direction of my schooling, or even how I get healthcare. On the flipside of that, however, I understand that without some kind of government or controlling party, people would not be held accountable for their actions which in turn affect everybody. Citizens should be able to be in control of their personal lives and the dreams the want to achieve with the help, not hindrance, of their government. While I do not by any means enjoy the constant bombardment of people asking me to sign petitions for various reasons, I applaud these people because they are taking a stand for what they believe in, no matter how much they are ignored or shot down. Even though this debate will continue to be fought, government needs to find balance between working for its people and keeping its country safe. This is the only way it will ever succeed and fulfill the role for which it was created.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Polish Prosperity

When most immigrants decided to come to America they really did not have a great deal of information about what would lie ahead. “America is full of opportunities!” “Everyone will have the life they have always dreamed of in America!” This idea of achieving the American Dream as well as a leap of faith was all people had to go off of before deciding to make new lives. People from all around the world took this chance and found better lives and greater opportunities to start fresh on the opposite side of the globe. My family, for example, came from Poland searching for their own piece of the great American pie; hoping to increase their chances of living better lives. These great promises of America lead millions of immigrants to this great land in order to create the legacy we are all apart of today.

When my great grandparents came over from Poland to Ellis Island in New York they were actually on the same ship but had never met. They immediately went to find work and grow accustom to their new home. Eventually through fate they met, fell in love and married soon after. I interviewed a relative in order to find out more about their story and how they made their mark in this new home. I was told that my great grandparents, along with other Polish people were really the backbone of middle class America at the time. Most learned English very quickly in order to adapt to their new surroundings and got jobs that would be considered “blue collar.” Men typically worked on assembly lines, in meat packing, or on the railroads being built nearby. They followed their traditions like religion (typically Catholic), received a neighborhood paper in Polish, and continued use of their native language usually outside the workplace. Their hard work and dedication paved the way for future generations to go a step beyond and continue to leave a positive legacy behind.

My great grandparents worked so hard in their new country in order to give their children a better life than they had growing up as well as back in their native land. Even with eleven children to look after they managed to provide great moral lessons and traditions that are still being passed down to me and my younger relatives today. By doing the jobs others typically would not prefer, and by working hard everyday the people of Poland were able to leave a positive impression on the economy and the country itself. This momentum created by their excellent work ethic allowed their children to attend college so they could provide more for their families, which in turn allowed their children’s children to become more educated and fulfill greater jobs and places in the world today. I know that without the dedication and determination of my ancestors and relatives I would not be able to attend a major university on scholarship or dream of one day attending graduate school. The Polish legacy left behind by my relatives is proof that hard work and willingness to adapt to new surroundings without losing who you are can really make a difference.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Week 10 Blog Reviews

Deirdre Cienki: I really enjoyed your first post regarding all the different point of views of those traveling on a bridge in New York. I liked how you kept the reader hanging while you went on to explain another aspect and point of view of the story. That “cliffhanger” idea really works and is a great deal of fun to read. My only suggestion would have been to take out one particular story in order to develop the other pieces of the post more. While it was exciting and kept me hooked, it also left me hanging because I felt like there were more details about the people as well as the product that could have been explained.
I think the title to your second post is so clever! It really captures the essence of part of the music industry today. I agree with your statement which mentions the fact that although most people believe it is unacceptable for others to call women such demeaning names, but as long as the music sells it won’t matter. You made strong points within your post but I thought it ended quite abruptly. I wanted to read more about the topic and other issues our society is facing if we continue to support music and other facets of life even though they do not follow the morals and ideals we live by. Good Work this week!

Jess: I’m excited to see if you’ll change your background to something for thanksgiving! I really liked your story regarding the on sale tennis racket! I know that has happened to all of us: we believe we have gotten the deal of the century, but in reality there is always a catch! The whole story kept me really hooked throughout and I also liked how you tied the idea having a new racket to being a better player, which turned out to be untrue. I wish you could have incorporated more products into your story, but it sounded like this tennis racket was the only thing that could have made the day! Great Job! P.S. Don’t forget to do both posts! =)

Lauren: I really liked your title “Parental Advisory.” I’m really going to have to start getting clever with my titles in order to keep up with everyone! I liked how you tied in the fact that hip hop has really taken over the globe because it is such an influence and driving force in the modern world. Overall, you made really great comments regarding this topic but I felt like the post itself was too short. I wanted to hear more opinions and thought on the subject, but it seemed just to fall short. My suggestion would be to really sum up all your ideas or create an ending that really drives your point across. Your second post was so graphic! I was not anticipating such a vivid description, but you made me feel like I was in the room which is impressive. I also liked the ending and how the uncle finished what he started regardless of injury. My only advice would be to incorporate more products or elements to the story in order to really create irony like the author did. Great job this week!

Buy Now!

Our modern world is driven by the desire to own or operate the most up-to-date technologies and possessions. We live for trends and other products that give us the guidance we need in order to own the latest and greatest. Most believe this concept known as materialism is everything that is wrong with our world; spreading nothing but greed and other negative thoughts through citizens, but is it really so bad? Expansion and constant ability to update what we already have is what advances our society and what allows us to grow and increase our intelligence as a whole. As author James Twitchell mentions in his article, “Two Cheers for Materialism” consuming and owning the newest products on the market is what makes us happy (389).

Materialism is a way to express who we are through what we buy and what we choose to wear and drive. It does not always have to lead to clouded minds or corporate greed, but can bring us to our own place of happiness and satisfaction with ourselves. We work hard for our money and struggle everyday with the common man’s problems so shopping and spending can be a great stress relief just like any other hobby or after work activity with friends. Having a bad day at the office or at school can easily be solved with a great sale at the nearest shopping mall or department store. As long as people keep earning their money and working hard to get it, they will continue to spend it on the items and possessions that make them happy, and who would not want happiness?

The downside to materialism and what people focus most on is the idea that this concept leads to nothing but greed and other environmental defects we all have to suffer from. The truth is that in order to make all the cars, clothes, and other items we hold so dear it takes a toll on our environment and ideas about an ideal life. Decades ago, our world did not revolve around spending and constant turn-over of new products. It relied on hard work and dedication in order to make enough for your family and the small group of those around you. Now a new car or computer is purchased every few years in order to keep up with the trends and those around us so we can save face in our community. Whether we admit it or not, the car you drive, the furniture in your house and even the cell phone you carry allows others to get great insight into your world and whether or not you can “keep up with the Joneses.” Materialism and the need to consume will always be a part of our culture and the lives we lead everyday because that is how we choose to live and use the money we work so hard to get.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Move Over Miley!

In the modern world professionals are more interested in what will make them the most money, than what will actually please the population. Musical artists, television, and movie stars are becoming less talented and driven yet are selling their products faster than ever. Major executives are not looking to please the common man looking for more depth than the Jonas Brothers or Miley Cyrus can give, yet these “stars” are rising more quickly and younger than ever. In the past people used to care about the level of performance or product being put out there, artists and stars with less talent did not seem to make it as far, thereby giving us the “greats” like the Beatles, Elvis, and Frank Sinatra. Consumers from previous generations did not really care about who looked best as a Barbie Doll or on a lunch box. Corporate greed and ability to give us less than what we deserve needs to be addressed and hopefully lessened before “teeny boppers” completely control the airwaves.

So many artists, actors, and musicians go unnoticed by bigger labels because they simply do not have the “right look” or “appeal” a company is looking for. Amazing talents are forced to stay underground and without the fame they really deserve while others rise to the top because of their look or ability to use technology in order to enhance their mediocre vocals. It needs to be less about commercial appeal and more about what is actually being put on shelves, the radio, and television. Adults would never let their young pre-teen child make an executive, important decision yet it is these young adults that completely control what is being placed on the market today. Go into a store and you will see these celebrities endorsing t-shirts, posters, even cereal boxes at the grocery. It is hard to find a lunchbox or Barbie without one of these under-talented people on it. America needs to re-shift its focus from what is cute and popular, to what actually sounds good or is acted out well. It is the only way to get people who do not deserve to be on the radio or on television back to where they belong in order to make room for those who do.

A topic that is frequently brought up within our generation is how we will be remembered or the legacy we are leaving behind for others to see. With our financial troubles, environmental issues, and inability to produce entertainment that really makes a life changing statement like it had in previous generations does not make us look like we made a positive impact on the world. Our world has been taken over by celebrities and their ability to persuade us to purchase their products or see their movies simply because their name is behind it. I can honestly say the last three movies I went to see in theatres were absolutely terrible, mildly entertaining but never something I would dream of owning or ever want to see again. The biggest reason why I went to see these films was because of who was in them and because of the work they have done in the past. Who pays attention to plot lines and actual ability to make a difference when Robert Pattinson or Beyonce is playing the title role? Our world will hopefully one day get past this tendency to support those who are simply attractive or are the daughter of a one hit wonder.

If a twelve year old wants to listen to artists made popular on the Disney channel or Nickelodeon it is absolutely acceptable, though I would not recommend them as role models. The problem is when these people meant to entertain children are clogging the airways of adult radio stations and television networks. That is the reason why radio Disney and other children’s channels were created: in order to keep the adult and kid stuff separate. I want to listen to an artist that has real life experience and that I can relate to in order to help me through the rough and easy times in my life. Everyone is looking for a story or public figure that they can possibly relate to in order to feel like their not alone. The underground figures need to rise above and make their voices heard so the world can get the level of entertainment and quality of life it deserves because we cannot accept beautiful yet talentless role models and public figures anymore.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Free Upgrade

Free Upgrade

Recently my sister and I had decided to use our “free” mobile upgrade from our wireless carrier in order to become proud Blackberry owners. What we thought would be a fun, painless experience quickly escalated in to a cellular nightmare. We have always had the typical, non-extravagant phones in the past and therefore had no idea of the complexity and education it requires to purchase, set-up, and use such a state of the art piece of equipment. We found out soon enough.

Our journey into the wonderful world of wireless began at our usual T-Mobile store in the mall. As we looked around the store at all the new phones and gadgets we realized how pricey the best stuff was. Surely our “free upgrade” would kick in allowing us to purchase a piece of the Blackberry pie for less. We soon spoke with an associate who broke the horrifying news: If we wanted Blackberries it would cost us $129 each for the phone alone not including activation, data and other fees. Disappointed and confused we left the store thinking our dreams of Blackberry bliss were over. Soon after we looked into other retailers and found a place where our upgrade would actually mean something: Best Buy. Finally the dream seemed attainable again.

We entered the store almost three hours before closing on a Monday night hoping to get our upgrades and finally have the phones we have always wanted. However, it was not a pain-free experience. We had to have our mom there (whose bedtime was rapidly approaching) in order to authorize the account and give permission for changes made. After a few minutes of searching for phones, my sister and I had decided on the phones we each wanted, both only $29 a phone! What a steal! That feeling of rapture was short-lived when the phone I selected turned out to be $129 requiring me to rapidly become interested in the device my sister had picked out. This was another small obstacle encountered compared to what was to come.

The overall process of purchasing and set-up took almost three hours which was past the store’s closing as well as momma’s bedtime. Our time was filled with so many questions, options, and extras that the three of us were utterly exhausted by the end. Then the woman suggested we purchase armor for our phones in order to prevent scratches and other marks. She was really selling us on all the extras, just another day in the world of retail. After all was said and done we paid $60 each for the phone as well as the protective armor. Not a bad price for a slice of Blackberry pie.

Next we had to wait for another guy to fit both our devices with the armor, an extremely slow, intricate process filled with lots of pieces as well as patience. My sister is older and therefore got to have all her stuff done first which included the protective fitting leaving my phone and experience feeling like sloppy seconds. My guard was applied much faster with less precision causing it to peel almost immediately requiring a second trip back to the far north Scottsdale location. In spite of everything we left the store that night feeling exhausted, yet excited for the fun filled days of wireless internet and messaging to come. Unfortunately, it never would. A week later we still did not have internet causing much frustration and anger for my sister and I. Back to Best Buy for another round in the Blackberry abuse ring. As we went through the many menus and operators of T-Mobile customer care line, we wondered if it would ever lead to a happily ever after. We finally got through and discovered the ad charged us, but had “forgotten” to turn on the service they had already been taking our money for. They promised the error would be fixed, the internet would come on and the armor would be re-done. For now we are the somewhat happy owners of state of the art technology. It cost us a measly six total hours in the store, multiple calls to customer care, several re-fittings of armor, and a fiery associate who would not quit until we got our piece of the pie we deserved. It was worth it. Right?

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Week 9 Blog Reviews

Week 9 Blog Reviews:

Ashley: I really liked your first post titled, “Don’t Compare Yourself to Others…Even Animals.” You had a great deal of support from our text to back up your points and really explain the article from your point of view without losing academic credibility. I also really liked how you described humans as being able to choose what they want and how to live their lives, while animals just do something to do it. It really gave a strong contrast between us and animals and how comparing the two just because some similarities exist, does not mean it is right. While the amount of support really enhanced your post, I felt their may have been too many quotes and facts taken directly from our readings. It felt like I was just reading a facts sheet on the topic instead of your argumentative piece. Finding a balance between quotes and your ideas (not personal thoughts) will make the piece flow much more.

For your second post I really liked the playful manner in which you presented the information; saying that it is the answer to all problems according to men. This just like your post before really incorporates facts from the text and the readings we completed. It seemed to have a bit more balance in comparison to the article before, but I still feel like you could fill in your paragraphs a little more before you present another fact. Inserting a fair amount of commentary to go along with your facts will really make your posts even more solid. I’ve really enjoyed your help and reading your papers during this unit! Good luck in the future!

Jess: I love your new background! The Halloween theme, cute ghosts, and spiders are so fun! In your first post (It’s Natural Attraction) I thought you had a really strong back-up points to your argument and really presented the difference between humans and animals. I really did not like how you ended both your introduction and your overall essay with quotations from the text. It took away from your overall argument on the topic and made your post seem like almost a summary of just the article. Your original sentences and ideas are what should make up the bulk of your paper. Your ideas are what matters!

Your second post, My Chemical Romance was well written and again had a great deal of support behind it. I really liked your part about being able to bottle the bond between mothers and children. I thought that section was really creative. It may just be a personal preference but I really did not like how many rhetorical questions you included in your posts. One may be acceptable in order to prove a point, but when several are incorporated it really distracts from your writing and overall points you are trying to make. Great writing this unit! Thank you so much for your input and criticism and good luck next section!

Thursday, October 15, 2009

What's Natural Nowadays?

What’s Natural Nowadays?

One of the hottest debates in the modern world is on the topic of homosexuality. Is it natural or is it not? Should same-sex unions be allowed in our society? Most people who sit on the religious side of this issue consider homosexuality to be abnormal, or against the natural way humans were created to act. Others believe the tendency to engage in same-sex relationships are like any other choice made throughout a lifetime, simply liking one option over the other or even a part of their genetic make-up presented at birth. Even though scientific observation and experimentation has shown the possibility of these ideas, people will still side on both ends of the issue.

In Jeffrey Kluger’s piece entitled, “The Gay Side of Nature” he discusses the different evidential findings regarding homosexual tendencies in animals (337). This article contains observations of over 450 species that participate in same-sex relations and behaviors (Kluger 338). The essay is basically trying to portray the idea that if animals do it without the influence of our modern society and its ideal behaviors it must be a natural act. What this article fails to mention that would significantly help its credibility is whether or not the animals being observed are in the wild, their typical environment, or if the couples are being watched in captivity. This missing piece of vital information would either solidify the argument or continue to raise more questions on the topic. One point that proves to be innovative as well as substantial is the fact that animals in general tend to be associated with what is considered to be natural, as well as corresponding to the behaviors we as humans take part in. Although certain actions are considered natural does not mean they are always correct or appropriate. In previous articles on the topic of love and reproduction several authors and findings say our purpose on earth is to preserve ourselves through our children and continuing generations. If this is the case, homosexuality and taking part in relationships when the end result will not be procreation lies within the realm of things that are unnatural. This of course does not mean same-sex relationships and unions cannot take place throughout a person’s lifetime, it just will not be (according to those who believe our only goal on earth is to produce children) natural.

Doing something that feels natural or is perceived as pure can be a beautiful thing, but it can also be offensive or inappropriate as well. For example, giving birth, falling in love, or having the call to help others is a part of life that has been deemed acceptable or typical. A person can experience these things usually without having to think twice about who is watching over them or what others think in general. Other natural feelings like arousal or anger are also a part of every person’s life, but what a person chooses to do with those emotions is what can turn inappropriate. If a man gets turned on by his wife in public it is not acceptable for him to “act” on those feelings in a community space, just as if another man gets upset over an altercation and chooses to release his anger through violence and destructive acts. It is in situations like these that our natural feelings and tendencies to take action on our emotions can lead to turmoil. Overall, feelings and the typical activities humans take part in are only considered ordinary because of those behaviors acted out in the past. Experts could be completely off-track making the behaviors and things we take part in daily the opposite of what really is the natural way. Who is really to judge what is natural or unnatural? Perhaps this should be the hot topic everyone should be discussing, instead of whether or not it is natural to fall in love or have a relationship with the same-sex.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

More than Just Reproduction

There are many aspects that make a relationship successful, whether it is from a romantic point of view or even a friendship. While some believe that interaction and the idea of bonds between people are nothing more than chemical reactions or the mere fact that as humans we are supposed to find “the one” and reproduce, others know there are many more factors that make a relationship successful. Even though some professionals will continue to compare human unions to those of animals and scientific theories, others are convinced that it takes much more than science in order to create a lasting bond. No matter what statistics or professionals say in the end, each relationship is unique with its own ups and downs as well as what really goes on behind the scenes in order to keep the love alive.

Not every aspect of life needs to be broken down into the overall goal of mankind: reproduction. In Helen Fisher’s “After All, Maybe it’s…Biology” she constantly makes connections between modern dating and previous civilization offerings in exchange for mating (303). While there is clearly evidence that behavior stays similar throughout history, not all actions and emotions can be broken down into simply sex and child-bearing. This particular author also completely drags love at first sight through the mud by reducing a romantic act into nothing more than something squirrels do in order to procreate (Fisher 305). For most people finding a lasting, loving relationship is much more important than simply having children, although it usually is a part of marriage. In today’s world finding a suitable mate over a short period of time and attempting to procreate is not on anybody’s list of goals to accomplish.

Chemistry is an important part of any relationship. A romantic union will rarely be successful and happy if those within the relationship are not attracted to one another. While the aspect of chemistry and personal attraction cannot be denied, it typically is not the only factor within a man and woman’s bond together. Trust, items in common, communication, and the ability to grow as a couple are just a few of the traits most look for and strive to achieve in their relationships and marriages everyday. As mentioned above, each connection is unique, using individual aspects of love, attraction, and communication in order to make it successful. Something as complex and intense as love and lasting relationships should never be reduced to simply chemistry or biology. Even though the author believes scientifically love fades after only a few years, hopeless romantics will prevail and keep the multi-layered aspects of true love and relationships alive.

Week 8 Blog Reviews

Week 8 Blog Reviews

Ashley: In your blog entitled, “Leave Marriage Alone” I thought you did a really great job of incorporating the opinions and facts that were offered in our readings that week. The quotes and pieces from the readings used really enhanced the point you were trying to make. I felt like your title was setting me up to hear all about how marriage should remain within our society, but after reading your post I got a negative response from the topic. You pointed out many of the hardships and issues that the union of marriage is facing today which counteracts your original title. Your introduction paragraph also focused a great deal on the “heterosexual” aspect of marriage, but in reality most thoughts on the subject ended there. If you re-organized your essay, as well as changed your title I think you would have a very thought-out, supported essay.

Your other blog post, “Are you listening to me?” really hit home for me (as you can tell by my past post). I thought it was really interesting how you incorporated authors from last week as well as your own personal experiences in order to make an interesting and more solid argument. I also really liked how you made a reading suggestion for those of us who deal with similar issues. I agree that Tannen is biased within her article and that we as readers should not believe everything an author puts in front of us. I felt like your essay jumped from topics a great deal though, starting with same sex friendships then going to relationship communication, and then discussing things within marriage. My only suggestions would be to really focus on one specific topic and really drive your point home. Great writing this week!

Jess: In your essay, “Are you just Hearing?” I thought you made really good points as well as used personal experiences to prove those ideas. I also really enjoyed how you brought in a different idea regarding the topic of you may be hearing but you just are not listening. I thought your piece might have been more successful if you had really incorporated things from the male point of view. You mentioned how women respond in conversation and when they listen but did not really discuss what men do.

In the “Evolution of Relationships” I really liked all of your support for your arguments. You used Disney movies, our readings, as well as statistics to really show how our society is as well as what we believe in now. I also like how you chose not to defend one side of the argument, but rather proved points for both sides. I’m not sure about the small section directly below your essay, maybe just a typo? I would try to just narrow your topic down into something you can go in great depth about instead of discussing so many different topics. Overall, great job this week! I look forward to reading your writing as well.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Team Monogamy!

Till death parts us. Most recognize these words as the bonding between man and woman in matrimony, a sacrament that has come under fire over the last few decades. Not only has discussion of same-sex marriage been a hot topic, but the constantly increasing divorce rate in America has been at the forefront of marriage talks. Some believe that marriage is unnecessary; that receiving a paper does not signify undying, devoted love or that until all are allowed to join in union they simply will not partake. Robert Wright, author of Our Cheating Hearts, claims that although humans are thought to be one of the most monogamous creatures on earth it is simple not the truth (279). Although the divorce rate is higher than ever, and some scientific research is showing the human struggle with staying with one mate, the idea of heterosexual, monogamous marriage should stay in full effect.

“Human beings were called a ‘pair-bonding’ species (Wright, 279).” This means that humans, for the most part, tend to find one another in the hopes of a happy union as well as the opportunity to create their own family together. In the past divorce or separation was considered disgraceful and was deeply frowned upon by society; but in the modern world it seems to be acceptable for men and women to marry a few times, or at least until they “get it right.” Research shows that people are engineered to fall in love; an emotion which seems to be one of the most important when couples decided to whether or not to take their relationship to the next level or not (Wright, 280). Marriage is the step that solidifies one person’s commitment to another, it never states the road will always be easy or troubles will not find them, but rather calls on a couple to figure out how to stay together during those challenges as well as the happy times. Men and women now more than ever need to rise above the high divorce rate and beat the odds in order to make it to that coveted “golden anniversary.”

Even though adultery and small emotional relationships on the side have been more prevalent in the recent times, it does not make the behavior appropriate. Wright stated in his article, “It is natural for both men and women-at some times, under some circumstances- to commit adultery or to sour on a mate, to suddenly find a spouse unattractive, irritating, wholly unreasonable (280).” While this statement is circumstantially true and supported by evolutionary psychology, it does not mean an affair or stepping out on a partner is acceptable. Obviously in every marriage or relationship there have been times when arguments have ensued or a re-evaluation of what works and what does not in the union, but the lust felt for the cute guy in the office may not lead to action. Self control and remembering the promises made to one another can really make a difference in a marriage. Monogamy has more challenges and disbelievers than ever in the modern world, but it does not mean that love and a man and woman’s true devotion to one another cannot prevail.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Reviews for Week 6!

Week 6 Blog Reviews:

Ashley: I really liked your blog about the modern family. I thought you incorporated the ideas of D’ Emilio really well, and also used modern examples in order to show that family values have changed. I would encourage you to include more complex sentences in your blog, maybe it is a personal preference of mine, but when you have such short statements it gives the post a choppier feel. I think comparing past to present more would have helped your argument as well. Capitalism is the view today but what did people follow back then or how did families interact without the use of modern conveniences?

I thought your next post was great as well. Most of us have seen the film so it was really easy to follow and relate to. I like how you mentioned the disappearance of the 1950’s housewife; I thought that was really well done. I think you may have mixed up the characters when you were citing them near the beginning, so watch for that and also make sure you finish an entire thought. At one point you say that the girls were only 18 but allowed to take this crazy road trip across the country, but left it at that. I think if you had mentioned this is not typically how parents are or another reason why this attributes the movie to the topic of “wild women” I think it would have been more successful. I hope this next unit will be tons of fun! Great work!

Jess: I agree with Ashley! Your blog is very cute! I loved your opening sentence in your piece about heterosexual idealism. It really got me prepared for the topic and post I was getting ready to read. I also really liked how you compared past and present life. It really supports your essay’s ideas because it gives the reader a chance to see the then and now result. I think you needed to relate your post more towards the modern American family, which I believe was the topic for this week’s essay. While I really liked your interesting take on the different technology (sex-change operations) I feel like you could have linked all of it together, such as how families have changed as well as what technology has done to change it.

I’m really glad you found such a great substitution! I really struggled with the assignment as well. I liked how you went into detail about the two characters and described their mannerisms as well as their everyday occurrences. I also liked the connection between Wallace and Mr. Schuester; it really gave your article direction and support. I failed to see the connection between the characters and the prompt. It seemed like just a character description (which I liked) but then failed to relate to the topic of “wild men.” The sophomore went out of his comfort zone in order to feel more in tune with his true self, and the teacher did everything he could to please his wife but I do not see how that makes them real “wild men.” I’m looking forward to being in your group this time around! Keep up the great writing!

Directed Freewrite

The other day my boyfriend Dylan and I decided to go for a long bike ride. The seemingly scorching Arizona heat had disappeared overnight and a little bit of exercise as well as time out of the house was all the motivation we needed to go. He has been riding a bike for most of his life and it is also his main form of transportation around town, while I on the other hand have not ridden a bike since elementary school. For my last birthday my parents bought me a beautiful, bright yellow beach cruiser complete with matching wire basket. I truly loved the gift but was uncertain about my ability to properly use it as much as I should. Dylan assured me we would have a great time and I would catch on quickly. Like the old saying, “It’s like riding a bike” you never really forget how to do it. In this case, that saying was wrong.

We started out around the neighborhood with wide sidewalks and slow traffic streets, and then gradually moved up to the canal and my now least favorite place to ride: Old Town Scottsdale. We stopped every once and awhile to pop into a French cooking shop or a small pizzeria for dinner which seemed like the perfect activities to include along our ride. It soon turned dark and we realized we had wandered farther into the maze of small streets and sharp turns than we wanted to. I soon became frustrated and anxious when I discovered how difficult it was to maneuver these tiny turns especially in the dark. While Dylan easily glided through the town, I wobbled and constantly needed to use my feet for guidance on the ground. I kept trying to tell him I could not go so fast or through such small spaces as easily as he could, but he did not really seem to understand my struggle. It started out as a fun, innocent adventure soon turned into a terrible nightmare.

Dylan was constantly cutting across streets as the light turned yellow making it impossible for me, at my current bike-riding skill level, to keep up. I voiced over and over how I could not keep up at his pace or steer what I now call my “big yellow boat” down such difficult paths. He told me he thought I was right behind him or able to move where he was leading us, but I felt like he just did not get it. After I got left behind again and wiggled down yet another staggered pathway, I lost it. I began to cry in the middle of the park while my boyfriend stared at me in horror. I told him that he never listens to me, while he claimed he was only trying to help. We went back and forth accusing one another of either listening issues on my side, and the fact that I needed to relax on his. In reality we were simply misreading each other’s intentions. If I had read this particular article before we had gone for our ride, perhaps I would have realized that he was not trying to make my life more difficult, but rather was trying to help me. While I do not believe our communication in general is lacking, this article helped me discover that he and I have different ways of showing that we understand or that we really are listening. Next time we are in a similar situation, I will be sure to try to look at it from his point of view and believe him when he tells me he is listening. The article seemed to really promote understanding as well as compromise from both sides of a conflict within a relationship which is something every couple or even friends go through in order to make their relationship work. Hopefully in the future I will remember this article before I begin to cry in the middle of the park on a never-ending bike ride.

Tannen, Deborah. Communications- He Said/ She Said. You Just Don't Understand.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Technology Changes the American Family

The American Family has changed a great deal over the last few centuries. Like author of Capitalism and Gay Identity John D’Emilio said in his article, our country once depended on the individual family unit and their ability to create food and other textiles for their survival (228). We are now a society that lives separate lives and relies on the headset in our ear, or a computer beneath our fingertips. Back then it was unheard of to live away from the other members in your family because it meant you were depriving them of your hands and labor that was mandatory for the family to survive. In today’s world children are able to study abroad without worrying about their family’s survival. Even though our economy and life as we know it is changing, the ability to be a strong family unit is still possible.

As D’Emilio explained in his article, one-hundred years ago the economy and well-being of a community all depended on how a family was able to work together in order to have food, clothing, and other necessities available (230). Technology has now created more opportunities and techniques to make everything easier for the world. Technology has also changed the way in which families interact and keep in touch with one another. A child can move across country and still communicate with their family through email, text messaging, and the up and coming Skype which actually allows people to see one another while talking. Without the assistance of technology and other forms of communication, the typical American family may not have had the opportunity to change to the level it is at today.


D’Emilio, John. “Capitalism and Gay Identity.” Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. By: Monthly Review Press. 1983.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Wild Men

The only movie I could really think of on this topic that I have actually seen is “The Outsiders.” It was first a book based off the lives of young men that lived on opposite sides of town and therefore divided themselves into the “greasers” and “socs.” It is told from one of the youngest greasers, Ponyboy who seems to have a more naïve outlook on his life and the different events that take place throughout the movie and novel. I believe this is a case of “Wild Men” because after Johnny (a greaser) kills a soc in self defense, he and Ponyboy are forced to run in order to avoid time in jail. They are two teenagers forced to survive on their own and stay hidden from family and friends. They end up miraculously becoming hometown heroes when they save children from a church fire; an accident that cost Johnny his life. Ponyboy has to return home and face the troubles he left behind between his family, the greasers, and the socs from the nicer side of town. The socs and greasers are continuously fighting and will never seem to stop, not even with the help of the slain soc’s girlfriend Cherry. This movie takes on the classic issue of how kids from “opposite sides of the tracks” will never get along or understand things from the other group’s point of view.

In Jack Boozer’s article on wild men and wild women he mentions while analyzing Thelma and Louise the importance and effect the setting can have on its characters and the overall theme that is trying to be portrayed (208). Boozer discusses the influence the West has on Thelma and Louise and how that setting plays into the culture of the film; this is similar to what is occurring in “The Outsiders (209)’ Where the story takes place sets up all the conflict as well as the pivotal moment where Pony and Johnny become real wild men. It is through this setup of men from opposite sides of town that lessons are learned and lives are changed forever. This view of where the story takes place also creates opportunity for culture to be involved which is another factor the author Boozer mentions (Boozer, 208). The feud between both groups in the movie is based around two cultures colliding. The Socs are clean-cut, wealthy, letterman jacket wearing young men while the Greasers are less privileged, rough around the edges, leather jacket wearing boys. It is through their constant fighting and “Rumbles” that boys become men and both sides have their bonds tested when they lose people they care about. The fact that a woman tries to play the peacemaker or problem solver in this movie is also a reverse of the gender roles (Boozer, 210). Although she plays the “innocent girlfriend bystander” Cherry takes on a much more important role, a role that does not usually belong to the woman in a story of this nature.

Even though Ponyboy and Johnny only live like wild men or fugitives for a short period of time, they, as well as their other Greasers, really embody the characteristics of real wild men. Especially since Pony, along with his brothers are parentless in their situation. The other important factors that attribute this behavior are where the movie is taking place as well as the colliding cultures present in the story. Without the lack of parental supervision, classic setting of “who lives on what side of town,” and the constant reminder of cultural differences between the groups the presence of wild behavior would not have existed.

Boozer, Jack. “Seduction and Betrayal in the Heartland: Thelma and Louise.” Literature Film Quarterly, vol. 23 no. 3, (July 1995). Salisbury State University.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Week 4 Blog Reviews

Week 4 Blog Reviews:

Whitney: I think Whitney did very well this week. She was able to objectively sum up the painting she chose as well as give a well written opinion and insight into what she believed Kahlo was trying to express. My only criticism would be to include a more descriptive analysis of the painting. She did the objective aspect very well and chose many objects and aspects of the piece to point out, but I was missing a vivid description of the work itself. I wanted to know about the different colors and more about why Whitney believes Kahlo created this piece the way she did. I really enjoyed this week’s post. =)

Victoria: Victoria’s objective description was very impressive. She really was able to break down all the major factors that make up the portrait and discuss those elements in a distinct objective manner. I really enjoyed reading that aspect. I also liked how Victoria connected this particular painting into her own life by saying how sometimes she feels beaten down as well. My only constructive criticism is similar to what I said about Whitney’s post. I was really missing the vivid detail of the work itself. I wanted her to describe the painting so that even if I did not have a picture at the top of the post I could still have good insight into how it looked. I was looking for more of what Victoria had to say about the different elements and her opinion on how those pieces came together to form the whole picture. I didn’t have the guts to choose a painting that intense and controversial so kudos to that aspect as well! Good job this week =)

Nicole: I really enjoyed reading Nicole’s post this week. I think she did an excellent job describing the painting in both an objective and descriptive way. I read about the colors, shapes, and positions of all the factors that made up this piece. She also described how each element could possible relate to real life events that were taking place with the artist. Her ability to connect the two was very impressive. Great job this week! =)

Thursday, September 17, 2009


Frida Kahlo was a very brilliant, tortured artist in the last century. Her work has inspired books, other artists and leaders, and even a film about her life. During her lifetime many viewers of her pieces believed they were outlandish or shocking simply because she chose not to depict the average life or objects the majority of artists choose to create. One particular painting of Kahlo’s really caught my eye, and seems to relate back to her sometimes painful and dark lifetime.

In the painting entitled, “Tree of Hope” the artist herself is depicted in two separate settings. On the left side of the picture is Kahlo wrapped in hospital blankets on a gurney. She has either current lacerations or scarring from what appears to be a horrible accident. On this particular side, Kahlo has chosen to hide her face from view, showing the viewer only her lower back and her long black hair. The background includes a depiction of almost a canyon-like floor with cracks and mountain views toward the back. This half of the painting also shows the bright, burning sun in a somewhat clouded sky. The scene on this side promotes a more lively appearance.

On the right side of the painting the artist has chosen to face the viewer, this time fully dressed in traditional Mexican garb with her hair fully done and enlaced with bright red flowers. She holds a sign in one hand and her back brace in the other, although she appears to be wearing the brace as well. Kahlo also wears jewelry like earrings and a necklace on this side as opposed to the other where she only has a simple sheet over her. The background also has mountains and the appearance of a canyon, although on this side the sky is dark with only the luminescence of the moon for light. There is much richer color on this half of the piece.






Frida Kahlo has frequently been criticized for her choice of subject in paintings as well as the sometimes graphic and obscure way in which she chose to create. “Tree of Hope” is no exception to the unusual pieces Kahlo created throughout her lifetime. This particular painting seems to have a real resemblance and value to the life of the artist. In Martha Zamora’s Excerpts from Frida Kahlo: The Brush of Anguish, the author discusses a terrible accident Frida was in while traveling on a bus. Frida suffered horrific injuries that she had to deal with everyday for the rest of her life. This particular painting seems to capture the anguish and pain she went though after that particular encounter.

The left side of the painting shows the artist with long lacerations or scarring on her back, while she is lying on a hospital gurney. The fact that she has chosen to hide her face gives the viewer the impression that she is too humiliated to show her face and her pain. The unusual aspect of this particular piece lies in the background. While other artists typically let the colors and the lighting of their painting help enhance the mood or theme they are trying to convey, Kahlo does the opposite. On the side where she is miserable in pain the sun burns brightly and happily, giving off the impression that she is feeling this way as well. That however is not the case.

On the opposite side Kahlo appears to be liberated from her wounds although she still bears a back brace. The contraption she is holding in her hands appears to be the dream of one day living without it. The artist wears bold, rich colors which really stand out against the dark background. As mentioned above, the scene behind Kahlo does not seem to match the mood. On the right side the dark canyon, cloudy sky, and light lamination of the moon promotes an eerie, depressed mood, rather than liberation from medical obstacles.

Overall, this painting “Tree of Hope” really caught my eye. While I was expecting something outrageous and graphic from Kahlo, I found a more demur yet still unusual piece really makes a dramatic impact on its viewer. Kahlo really fits into the category of surrealism, with the particular objects she chooses to incorporate within her artwork as well as the change up of backgrounds in order to keep the viewer on their toes. Throughout her life and career Frida Kahlo chose to use the anguish and horrors she actually experienced in order to really make unusual, amazing surrealistic artwork as well as a name for herself in history.


Zamora, Martha. Frida Kahlo: The Brush of Anguish. Chronicle Books.

"Tree of Hope." Art Archive. 17 Sept. 2009 .

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

The "Wright" Way to Show Others AI

Wright’s essay was not what I was expecting in terms of an article about Artificial Intelligence, especially since previous articles have set a more scholarly, rigid tone. His piece really made it easier for those who do not really have a great deal of interest or understanding of the subject to really grasp the ideas and concepts behind machines and AI in general. Wright begins his article by describing a chess match that had just taken place between a human and computer; the computer represented AI and whether or not machines can really do it better than humans while the man, Garry Kasparov, was a symbol of hope for real flesh and blood people. Wright’s introduction has an obvious bias toward human existence, making it clear which team he was hoping to succeed. Wright goes on to discuss how Kasparov narrowly wins the match but shows a fatal flaw in AI in general: no common sense or soul for that matter (Wright, 140).

By exposing this lack of emotion in our machines, the author sets the reader up to discover how this absence of so called “street smarts” and passion has led to more scientific question about our own mind and state of consciousness. Wright mentions several different scientists and philosophers with their own views on Artificial Intelligence such as: Turing (creator of the Turing Test), Minsky, and Chalmers. Wright discusses their particular points of view as well as their discoveries in the world of AI. The author manages to stay with the reader throughout the article, making it feel as though we are all learning the baby steps and beginning stages of such a complex subject. Most readers, and as Wright mentions, have trouble separating our actual consciousness and ideas from our brain (Wright, 142). Some scientists claim to have discovered it all and have truly unlocked the secrets of the brain while other strongly state that the mind is still a mystery (Wright, 143). The author does very well to show both sides of the issue and let the reader know just how much thought and research has gone into solving the complexity that is consciousness.

Overall, Robert Wright made it much easier to complete this particular writing assignment. Instead of feeling like an outsider, barely grasping the ideas behind Artificial Intelligence, I felt revived. I now know even the smartest scientists in the world still argue about what exactly our thoughts and state of consciousness actually is and whether or not it is a mystery that will ever be solved. How can we know if a machine we just created has thoughts or its own level of awareness when we do not fully understand what that entails? Even if they did function with a mind of their own, machines still lack the basic instincts as well as common sense needed in order to essentially survive in the world today. It was a very pleasant surprise to read an article I could actually understand, and even come away with more knowledge when it comes to AI. Not only is the questioned raised regarding a machine’s ability to possess a state of total awareness, but the thought of us not being able to completely comprehend our own consciousness is brought to the light.


Wright, Robert. Can Machines Think? Maybe So, As Deep Blue's Chess Prowess Suggests.
Time: 25, March 1996. Time Inc.

Reviews a Second Time Around

Whitney: I agreed with Whitney’s opinions a great deal this week, especially in regards to artificial intelligence and consciousness. I too had never really stopped to think about whether or not machines really had their own state of being, or what the actual definition of consciousness was. It really is something I’m sure not many have thought about. Her free write blog also contained a great deal of information especially on the scientific end of what the brain and consciousness consists of. She went into great detail about how our thoughts work and the different processes that make up our ideas. Way to go Whitney!

Victoria: I had trouble starting the week’s writings as well! It was really difficult to know where to start from or even write an entire post about something I had never really thought about or understood. Even though it was a challenge, I believe Victoria did a nice job explaining the article while injecting her own opinions and voice into her piece. She’s absolutely right when she states something along the lines of how scientists do not even completely understand the mind and how consciousness works entirely. Great job Victoria!

Nicole: I really enjoyed Nicole’s Blog this week. Her organization of ideas makes it very easy to read and also makes her point of view really stand out. Her examples were also very creative too, like when she mentioned a growling stomach or even why people side with a particular political party. Her article on Artificial Intelligence was also a great read. While she was very firm in her ideas and beliefs, she also presented both sides of the story and had plenty of statements to back up her opinion on the subject. Nice Job Nicole!

Once again the blogs were so much fun to read! The group did a really great job this week.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Can Machines Do It Better?

Can Machines Do it Better?

Over the past century or so the debate over technology and whether or not it will surpass the human race’s intelligence has become more and more prominent. Some think computers will one day take over the planet and perform everyday tasks for us, making man and his abilities obsolete. Scientist Marvin Minsky believes computers and other forms of technology are more conscious than humans (Davidson, 116). Even though Minsky is a genius on the topic of artificial intelligence, some disagree with his ideas and research. The type of technology he was working on would be most used to complete tedious tasks at a much faster rate, making assembly lines and production much more efficient (Davidson, 117). The machines are also able to store many more memories and experiences because their state of consciousness is built to do so. Minsky states that people are only able to remember small amounts because of how we are programmed and how we have been set up to evolve (Davidson, 120). This makes the human mind seem much less capable than the “consciousness” of a machine. In regards to the question, “Has technology taken over our lives” the answer seems obvious to me.

Instead of believing computers will one day be able to run errands for us or for cars to drive themselves I want to look at the aspect of how much our society relies on technology and the intelligence behind it. In a person’s everyday occurrences they typically use several different outlets of technology such as a cell phone, laptop, television, and GPS. In these way computers have become smarter than humans just because humans have fallen to the temptation of the speed and convenience these devices give us. Do I believe my GPS is smarter than me because it can give me turn by turn directions? Or is it simply easier to punch my destination into the system, than it is to get out a map and find it myself? In this sense I do not agree that the system is more intelligent than I am, but that I would rather rely on its particular function.

Overall, the debate will go on. In some cases technology wins: we constantly use out-sourcing, cell phones, and even medical equipment with a much higher capacity to keep track of the human body. (Interestingly enough we use a machine and its intelligence to track the brain waves and activities of our own mind). However, in other ways the human mind triumphs: we can feel emotions, solve so called “everyday issues,” and even as Minsky said clean the house. Technology has yet to reach the point where it can complete those seemingly miniscule tasks, but even when they do humans will still be needed. Somebody has to press the “on” button right?


Davison, Clive. “I Process, Therefore I Am”. New Scientist. 1993 Vol. 137 No. 1866.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

What is an idea? Do I truly know?

It is very difficult for me to pin-point exactly what a thought or idea is. The topic itself is truly never something that has crossed my mind. I doubt many people have ever taken the time, or even the opportunity to look at it from a more abstract perspective. Impressive scientists like Crick and Edelman have taken this topic far beyond the questions asked within our text. Inside their books and articles they delve deeper and deeper within the mind to discover how our thought process and emotions truly work. My personal opinion of what an idea actually is does not stretch quite as far as those scientists, but it is what I choose to believe.

I believe thoughts and ideas come to us not only from our own personal morals and ideals, but outside sources like school, family, and what we perceive from the media. We have the amazing ability to take what we see and hear through media outlets and turn it into our own opinions and ideas. In reality a thought is something our curiosity and sense of discovery makes us create in order to answer the questions the universe and those within it provide. While scientists and theorists choose to “pick apart” the brain in order to see why we think the things we do, I along with millions of others, just want to know why we are here and how to get through the difficult times in our lives. Instead of breaking down my emotions scientifically, I choose to just leave it up to the matters of my heart. I would much rather believe love, anger, and happiness are emotions to feel within.

In the end it is very difficult to break down exactly what an idea or thought is, because it for one is something I have not ever taken the time to truly ponder, along with the fact that there is no one definition to go by. I choose to use my thoughts and ideas in order to make sense of my own life and get through the day, as opposed to exploring the dark, depths of my mind that I will never understand. While I use the influences, ideas, and thoughts of others in order to answer more fundamental questions in my own life, I can create my own morals and ideas in order to become a more complete and well rounded person.

Week 2 Blog Reviews

Nicole:
I think Nicole did a really nice job on both blogs for last week. She used references from the text to help tie in her ideas to the facts presented to us and even used personal experiences in order to prove her point in the first blog. The only part of her writing I can honestly give constructive criticism to is her conclusion of both blogs. I was waiting for an overview of all her main points and just a wrap up of her writing, but instead I felt as if something was missing. The facts, commentary, and personal additives make her ideas and points very strong; she’s just missing the over-the-top ending. Nice Work Nicole =)

Victoria:
Victoria had some really great points for both topics this week. She too was able to call upon past experiences and personal interactions in order to make her arguments stronger which really enhance her writing overall. She really lets the reader get to know her through the examples and words she uses which in itself is very impressive. Many writers struggle to find their voice while writing and Victoria has managed to achieve that. The constructive criticism I have for Victoria is to just proofread her posts before she submits them. There are a few small spelling and grammatical errors that distract from her main ideas. Just by making those small changes Victoria can continue to succeed. Good Job Victoria =)

Whitney:
Whitney did very well with last week’s blog subjects. She really had some great opinions and ideas for both topics which made for a very interesting read. For our “Good without God” discussion she brought up some really great points and was able tackle the subject from a different angle, which really made me view the question in an unusual way. My only suggestions would be to thoroughly read over her blog before submission. I think that would eliminate the minor grammatical and spelling errors, as well as to help her really organize her thoughts. Awesome Work Whitney =)

It was really exciting to read everyone’s blogs this week! It is really fun to see different point of views and writing styles. I cannot wait to read the work over this semester and see everyone’s writing improve. Great Job this week Ladies!

Thursday, September 3, 2009

I Still Believe!

Religion is constantly fought over subject throughout the entire world. Some believe in a single personal savior, while others follow several on their path to inner peace and alignment with the universe. In the end the overall goal for most religions or followings is to be a well rounded, kind person in order to make it to heaven or reincarnate into something really meaningful. It was very surprising to read in Lisa Conyers and Philip D. Harvey’s article entitled, “Religion and Crime: Do They Go Together?” that a person of religion is more likely to commit a crime or do otherwise known as “shameful” acts than a one who does not choose to follow (Conyers & Harvey, 1996). This seems to be the opposite of what most believe to be true, although I cannot say I truly subscribe to what their article is saying.

As I child and even now I have been surrounded by a “Catholic way of life.” Going to church and following the examples of my parents and community members truly instilled what my mom and I like to call our “Moral Compass.” It is the small alarm bell that goes off in my head whenever I am in a situation I should not be in. Catholics have the reputation of being very stark, stick to “The Book” type of people unwilling to evolve to an ever-changing world. This is somewhat true, they are out there but I have found many Catholics especially in my family and around my community who are more up to date or those who understand the new challenges we face in the modern world. While we make these adjustments in order to try to keep the world in balance, we still follow our “Moral Compasses” and God in order to continue being kind, understanding people in the world.

I was extremely surprised to read in the same article Catholics are the most violent and most likely to commit crimes (Conyers & Harvey, 1996). While everyone, no matter their religion or following, makes mistakes and must learn from experience I find it hard to believe that Catholics are most volatile. It seems to be the common perception that more Middle Eastern religions are more crime-ridden or violent. This is another opinion that I do not agree with. I do not think crime rates and acts of violence should be broken down by religion, race, or other ways they are currently reported. People tend to focus on the details and begin to form stereotypes and biases against certain groups just because color or religion was reported on the news. No matter what a person is a person, regardless of what religion they follow or what neighborhood they live in.

Overall, I agree with the first article when it discusses the fact that part of a person’s willingness to act out relies on personality and moral followings (Conyers & Harvey, 1996). Parts of those moral choices come from family beliefs and religions followed. That is something that cannot be denied. Does it mean my moral compass as a Catholic is much different than a Lutheran? Not necessarily. It is up to the person and the choices they make in order to determine if they can live a fulfilled life and stay on the right path without the assistance of God or other religious leaders. There are thousands even millions of people who have chosen to not follow God and still make good decisions. In my life, however, I need the extra help God gives me in order to keep my moral compass pointing in the right direction.


Conyers, Lisa and Philip D. Harvey. Religion and Crime: Do They Go Together?
In Free Inquiry, vol. 16 no. 3, 1996. Council for Democratic and Secular
Humanism.
Beedles, Bonnie and Michael Petracca (2001). Academic Communities/ Disciplinary
Conventions. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Social Psychology

Social Psychology- The Individual Self Blog

On the first day of school first impressions mean everything. Fellow classmates and educators get the chance to scope out those that they will be interacting with over the next few months. Cliques and groups are also formed by those that dress the same, play the same sports, or participate in similar activities. In essence a great deal is decided and the impression you make on others with speech, body language, and other actions determines where you stand among classmates. However, for students enrolled in online courses all of the above rules are different. People on a computer do not have the opportunity to interact with their fellow classmates and determine their personalities based on the voice or actions simply because that type of interaction never takes place. Although the traditional rules have been placed aside in an online class, people still have the opportunity to show who they really are.

The author Kenneth Gergen discusses how in our society face-to-face interaction is fading very quickly (Gergen 1991). With the capability and convenience of today’s technology more and more are choosing alternative methods of communication such as texting, social networking cites like Facebook and MySpace, and even video calling sites like Skype. We live in an “on the go” society and these advances in our communication have made life easier for all. Once again the question of being able to fully express one’s true self via the internet arises. Is it really possible to make a connection and impression on an individual you have never seen, but rather chatted with online or via text messaging? Even though technology seems to have taken away this sense of individuality and self expression by lessening the number of face-to-face meetings, it has also given people the opportunity to show their true colors in other ways.

Websites today provide adequate opportunity for its followers to express themselves in ways words cannot. Our blog webpage for example gave each student the opportunity to choose colors, layouts, fonts, music, as well as photographs to place on their individual page. It is through these choices our classmates will get a sense of who we really are as well as what we love to do. A student that chose the most basic layout with no pictures and a two sentence explanation of who they are gives others a sense that maybe this person does not like to put all their information out there, or does not take the class seriously. These are obviously just first impressions or observations, but in the end it is those first impressions that really last whether in person or via some outlet of technology. Gergen also put forth the idea that people will act the way society or those around them are acting (Gergen 1991). Meaning in order to not seem radical or unusual to others, people will act relatively the same way. In an online class students do not have to worry about this aspect of social behavior. A student can complete the assignments listening to loud, offensive music wearing a bathrobe, but due to the fact that no other classmates can actually see or hear them they are able to just be their natural selves without fear of rejection. People in traditional classroom settings do not have such luxuries.

In the end most believe the internet or other technological outlets can only hinder a person’s idea of their “true self” instead of opening up new possibilities for self expression. Those online have ample chances to really show others who they are, what their story is, and what they hope to get out of their time spent on a particular website. The world is constantly changing and allowing new opportunities for people to put themselves and their ideas out on the line without having to leave the comfort of their home or favorite bathrobe.





Gergen, Kenneth J(1991). The Saturated Self. Basic Books Inc.
Beedles, Bonnie and Michael Petracca (2001). Academic Communities/ Disciplinary
Conventions. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

My name is Susan Lynn Johnson. I am nineteen years of age and have lived in Arizona all my life. I was born to my parents Randy and Kathy Johnson who chose to name me after my favorite aunt Susan. Not only is it exciting to be named after such an amazing woman, but it is truly a name you do not hear very often in our younger generation. Plus being the only one in school was fun too! I also have an older sister named Lauren and she is amazing! She’s one of my best friends and the greatest older sister I could have ever asked for! We had so much fun playing together when we were younger and even enjoy many of the same activities today like watching Top Chef and Project Runway together.
When I was growing up I loved to play basketball at the local Boys and Girls Club and practice cello with the school’s orchestra program. Eventually in high school I moved on to activities I still enjoy today like running, shopping, and baking; although basketball and cello will always hold a special place in my heart. I found many great things during my four years in high school such as: cross country, track, friends I am still close with today, and my best friend and high school sweetheart Dylan. He and I have enjoyed going to more Diamondbacks baseball games than I can count, watching entire seasons of Prison Break in a matter of days, and cooking delicious meals over our last year and a half together. As I continue to study Speech and Hearing Science for a second year at ASU, Dylan attends a local culinary school to fulfill his dream of becoming a chef. In my spare time I work at Sprinkles Cupcake Bakery. I absolutely love describing my favorites like our Chocolate Marshmallow which is a rich dark chocolate cake with a real homemade marshmallow center that is dipped in amazing chocolate ganache. Who would not be excited about that? It is so much fun to see how excited people get about something as simple as the American classic cupcake, but at Sprinkles it truly is fantastic! Although I love the cupcake industry my true passion lies within speech pathology. The more I learn about Speech Pathology the more my passion grows for the subject. I really hope to work at an elementary school someday so I can really make an impact in the lives of young children. I feel like once I graduate and finally get out into the field I will always be so excited about my career and is that not everyone’s goal when the finish school? I am really excited to start a new semester at ASU and cannot wait for what lies ahead! Good luck this semester and go devils!