Can Machines Do It Better?

Can Machines Do it Better?

Over the past century or so the debate over technology and whether or not it will surpass the human race’s intelligence has become more and more prominent. Some think computers will one day take over the planet and perform everyday tasks for us, making man and his abilities obsolete. Scientist Marvin Minsky believes computers and other forms of technology are more conscious than humans (Davidson, 116). Even though Minsky is a genius on the topic of artificial intelligence, some disagree with his ideas and research. The type of technology he was working on would be most used to complete tedious tasks at a much faster rate, making assembly lines and production much more efficient (Davidson, 117). The machines are also able to store many more memories and experiences because their state of consciousness is built to do so. Minsky states that people are only able to remember small amounts because of how we are programmed and how we have been set up to evolve (Davidson, 120). This makes the human mind seem much less capable than the “consciousness” of a machine. In regards to the question, “Has technology taken over our lives” the answer seems obvious to me.

Instead of believing computers will one day be able to run errands for us or for cars to drive themselves I want to look at the aspect of how much our society relies on technology and the intelligence behind it. In a person’s everyday occurrences they typically use several different outlets of technology such as a cell phone, laptop, television, and GPS. In these way computers have become smarter than humans just because humans have fallen to the temptation of the speed and convenience these devices give us. Do I believe my GPS is smarter than me because it can give me turn by turn directions? Or is it simply easier to punch my destination into the system, than it is to get out a map and find it myself? In this sense I do not agree that the system is more intelligent than I am, but that I would rather rely on its particular function.

Overall, the debate will go on. In some cases technology wins: we constantly use out-sourcing, cell phones, and even medical equipment with a much higher capacity to keep track of the human body. (Interestingly enough we use a machine and its intelligence to track the brain waves and activities of our own mind). However, in other ways the human mind triumphs: we can feel emotions, solve so called “everyday issues,” and even as Minsky said clean the house. Technology has yet to reach the point where it can complete those seemingly miniscule tasks, but even when they do humans will still be needed. Somebody has to press the “on” button right?


Davison, Clive. “I Process, Therefore I Am”. New Scientist. 1993 Vol. 137 No. 1866.